tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post4326529035088123894..comments2024-03-28T19:43:47.388+01:00Comments on practical technical analysis: Weekly previewKrasihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07425885123775585052noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-52082933687375051642018-01-26T17:11:49.261+01:002018-01-26T17:11:49.261+01:00Cheers KrasiCheers KrasiAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-72906284874813103572018-01-26T16:54:34.602+01:002018-01-26T16:54:34.602+01:00SPX and NDX some sideway move probably triangle an...SPX and NDX some sideway move probably triangle and one more high. DAX with impulse lower it should make lower high and continue lower with the C wave from expanded flat, when the US indexes finish their pattern. Krasihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07425885123775585052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-40503967228320535692018-01-26T16:31:28.605+01:002018-01-26T16:31:28.605+01:00As much as I hate triangles , this last few days s...As much as I hate triangles , this last few days seems like a wave 4 triangle with perhaps a test of 2835ish to come before your spike high to finish off ....unless there's another 4-5 ,etc ?<br /><br />Just mindful that that's consensus and you always look for one more high too many .<br /><br />Do you see any clues in the Dax or NQ or are you thinking we get one more high everywhere?<br /><br />Thanks<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-63683254472399907732018-01-23T21:59:11.785+01:002018-01-23T21:59:11.785+01:00Wave c for GDX to test MA50/MA200 on the daily cha...Wave c for GDX to test MA50/MA200 on the daily chart will look much better than continuing higher.<br />Yes, one small wave 4 and 5 on the hourly chart is missing. On the daily chart too, but of a higher degree of course.<br />Histogram mMm is not such an important signal... especially against strong trend. In the direction of the trend is ok against it ignore.<br />Krasihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07425885123775585052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-11121652037892584502018-01-23T21:01:12.905+01:002018-01-23T21:01:12.905+01:00It is possible, but I do not know how to fit such ...It is possible, but I do not know how to fit such A-B-C in the rest of the pattern.Krasihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07425885123775585052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-30099969943004673662018-01-23T20:13:49.225+01:002018-01-23T20:13:49.225+01:00I forgot to mention .. I was looking at "COMP...I forgot to mention .. I was looking at "COMPQ" not SPX, Really Sorry. for SPX that doe snot make sense, what about COMPQ? if we consider a rising market starting from mid/end of 2002? thanks for your responses anyway.H2535https://www.blogger.com/profile/16210577408786171899noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-14216147358147647652018-01-23T20:07:58.544+01:002018-01-23T20:07:58.544+01:00Do you think GDX is corrective move higher and goi...Do you think GDX is corrective move higher and going down again for c wave in the next few days from daily/hourly chart? Thanks. Clearly SPX/QQQ daily/hourly chart looks like some last impulsive move? But still bigger corrective wave iv and v missing? What I don't understand is that SPX MACD histogram has so long mMm shape. What do you think about it? What's the reasonable expectation for the current MACD histo finishes its mMm shape?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-74607001228379779692018-01-23T19:31:47.547+01:002018-01-23T19:31:47.547+01:00I understand your idea, but a correction higher sh...I understand your idea, but a correction higher should correct a move lower.<br />And you have lower from 2000-2002 before that you have 20 years higher.<br />First 2000-2002 lower is corrective, second the move lasts 2 years and the correction 16 years.<br />Neither time nor size fit it does not make sense at all.Krasihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07425885123775585052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-74977171054703854232018-01-23T19:19:40.012+01:002018-01-23T19:19:40.012+01:00Start of Wave A in what I said was mid of 2002 , n...Start of Wave A in what I said was mid of 2002 , not 2000. Infact, I assumed that could start from mid of 2002 ( for Wave A) then the first Top before 2008 would be the A wave, then goes down to earlty 2009 (Wave B) and since then we ae in wave C... that was my assumption I made.H2535https://www.blogger.com/profile/16210577408786171899noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-27660110652399567842018-01-23T18:55:25.581+01:002018-01-23T18:55:25.581+01:00From 2000-2002 corrective move lower then some str...From 2000-2002 corrective move lower then some strange correction higher A-B-C for 16 years correcting 2 years, which goes to the moon.... such count does not make sense. <br />Krasihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07425885123775585052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-20050408549977102032018-01-23T18:48:36.882+01:002018-01-23T18:48:36.882+01:00H2535
Hi Krasi..thanks for updates... this Bull l...H2535<br /><br />Hi Krasi..thanks for updates... this Bull looks very strong..the worse news could not affect it so far. What if this count of EW is not a 5 wave ( I am looking at Long term) and it is ABC (Zigzag)? I think it start to match better to that pattern, because this wave that we are going on it now, is taking long. If that is the case, then we are on Wave C ride, and end of that will not look pretty at all. That way top of 2007 Is A , bottom 2009 is B and we are still running for C... what do you think? Krasihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07425885123775585052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4363707944748952823.post-60973168544905040862018-01-23T18:02:43.747+01:002018-01-23T18:02:43.747+01:00Hi Krasi.. I left a message but disappeared,,pleas...Hi Krasi.. I left a message but disappeared,,please check your email.H2535https://www.blogger.com/profile/16210577408786171899noreply@blogger.com