Nov 21, 2020

Weekly preview

Deja vu another vaccine pop and pullback. What changed is that this pullback is taking too long, which pushes the top later in time. The implications are for the cycle count - the high-to-high cycles are much shorter, such long 40w cycle high is not very likely.

I expect the pullback to continue next week. I think the indices are heading lower into 5w low followed by 20w high first half of December. The alternate scenario is the top is in.... this will be very strange - roughly 5 days up and 10 days reversal which reversed nothing so far.


TRADING
Trading cycle - technically switched to sell signal with another cross. I would say just weaker move up.
The high-to-high is getting too long again, low-to-low says we are close to a low. Both high and low expected - complete nonsense. We have to look at the other tools. I would say look at the new cycle model for the right answer.


TECHNICAL PICTURE and ELLIOTT WAVES
Short term - still in the b wave. I think we will see more before it is complete.


Intermediate term - nothing new. The indicators with divergences warning for a high. The pattern which fits best is symmetrical completing at 18m high.
What will be the difference between "this is the top" and the pattern is not completed even if lower high follows? - The speed of the decline. In the case of a top the decline will be fast. In the case of wave h(red) it can retrace a lot like all the way down to 3000, but it will move slowly like 2 months.

For those interested in Neowaves:
In a NEoWave Diametric, the time and complexity exhibited by each wave will be very similar, but they remain different in price. This creates the contracting and expanding shape.
In a NEoWave Symmetrical, most waves possess the same time, price coverage and complexity. So far we have 4 surges higher with the same complexity, size and time. The only exception is wave e which is longer in time. I suppose that is why Neely switched to symmetrical, because it describes better the price action.


Long term - the bull market completed in 2018. Since then a bunch of corrective waves. Currently I think this rally should be a corrective wave of a bigger pattern most likely triangle. Look at NDX we have corrective wave which is 1,618 bigger than the previous one which could be only b of a triangle. I think the best looking pattern is Neely's triangle. The indices are close to price high and turn lower. The indicators are pointing to topping not continuation. The weekly candles telling the same no continuation after the big green candle.


MARKET BREADTH INDICATORS
Market Breadth Indicators - pulling back from overbought levels. I would say preparing for short term divergences and we have already long term divergences.
McClellan Oscillator - lower from the top.
McClellan Summation Index - buy signal with long term divergence.
Weekly Stochastic of the Summation Index - buy signal with multiple divergences.
Bullish Percentage - lower from the high.
Percent of Stocks above MA50 - lower from the high.
Fear Indicator VIX - doing nothing.
Advance-Decline Issues - lower from the high.


HURST CYCLES
Short term cycles - adjusted to the new long term count lets see if it will play out next week.
With this model we should see the decline continuing next week for 5w low followed by move higher for 5w/10w/20w high.


Why suggesting a new cycle model - because this 40w cycle high is getting too long. From the top in 2000 the 54m cycle(highs) is running roughly one year shorter 3,5 instead of 4,5 years. The 40w cycle is roughly 7 months long instead of 9 months.... and now should be 10 months long?!?!? - I doubt it. On top of this the down part(40w low) was 2-3 months shorter than the usual, I would expect shorter cycle not extended one. Why the important high B wave and low C wave should be at 40w high/low followed by 18m high/low in the middle of nowhere it does not make much sense.

It is the same pattern and shape, the difference is the summation of three cycles causing this shape are not 10w/20w/40w but 20w/40w/80w. The key difference and confirmation - the initial decline will take longer like two months. Now waiting and watching what happens in the coming weeks.
All that this count has and the previous one has not:
- the sequence 20w/40w high -> 20w/40w low runs smoothly as it should be.
- the 40w high-to-high is running shorter as it should be.
- the important highs/lows are at 18m highs/lows at pattern highs/lows as it should be.

39 comments:

  1. I still don't see how this symmetrical works. I haven't seen Neely's version, but it looks like waves A/B/C/D/F all lasted around 1 month. Wave E was 2 months. If waves G/H/I also take around 2 months each, then it doesn't seem to fit the rules.

    I went back and checked Neely's other possibilities for this B wave from the March low, and I'm starting to lean more towards his Triple Zigzag/Combo - https://i.imgur.com/q2U0BWM.png

    The minimum targets for each zigzag to reach at least 61% of the prior one have been met perfectly- https://i.imgur.com/eeuj2YS.png

    Also SPX looks completely exhausted to me based on RSI. The fact that the last rally couldn't get over 70 on RSI and the divergences are forming a downtrend pointing to March for a low looks unlikely to see a new high - https://i.imgur.com/xjaRt92.png

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am not an expert and there is no much information on Internet. I have just read this page - https://kiprushov.wordpress.com/2008/11/28/symmetrical-formation/

      I am talking about neowave patterns because if you stick to the rules the classical EW patterns just do not work. For example there is no impulses for triple zig-zag, you have to allow zig-zags building bigger zig-zags.

      About time - G should complete in a few weeks roughly 1 month, 2 months is the decline for H and another month for I to complete 18 month high. So the symmetrical fits with cycles perfectly. This is another reason to talk about it. Two waves can be longer and/or bigger and this is ok.

      The price high could be easily G all this divergences and exhaustion you are seeing, but from theoretical perspective I think the pattern and cycle high will be latter. We will know if this is right or wrong when we see the speed of the next decline when it comes.

      Delete
  2. Yeah it could be that the rules for the symmetrical are not as strict as I assumed.

    I was mostly just surprised when I went back to Neely's 10/15 video last night and noticed how well the Triple Zigzag he showed fit his projections and fib ratios over the last month. He seemed to not like the way it looked when he dropped from the monthly to weekly chart, which is what made him prefer the diametric back then.

    Anyway like you said, it won't really matter in practice b/c his Zigzag pattern would be ending now, but the G wave of the symmetric would be near as well. So either way the top is near. I do agree with Neely's idea that the confirmation will be a break of 3209 and we will know for certain wave B is over.

    Otherwise when it comes to trading I find using RSI and other momentum indicators much more reliable signals for me than price levels or wave patterns on the chart.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Krasi, any thoughts on oil?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Krasi, the eur-usd?, like the indices?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the last 2-3 years everything moves in tandem. So yes everything will make high/low around the same time.

      Delete
    2. Do you know the targets ?

      Delete
  5. hello all......what is your buy target for uvxy? is it too early to at $12.30?
    Great blog.......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There will be at least test of the low so I would say waiting a few weeks is less risky.

      Delete
  6. I am of the view we are very close to a top. We should top this week. Everything from the beginning of the month has been zigzags. We are likely completing an ending pattern c wave.

    I think we come down in 5 waves into Feb/March timeframe.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O98yGXMKUeA

    This guy's outline matches perfectly with what is going on rn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not agree. 5w low is coming and another high.

      Delete
  7. DAX but DJ and SP500 are exactly the same - https://invst.ly/sxsur
    It looks like b of b right on schedule for 20d high and c of b should follow right on schedule for 5w low.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Neely now indicating that time is out on his diametric and the drop should start very soon for it to be valid . He says a new high means the whole pattern from March needs recounting . Sees this week as pivotal .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looking the pattern and cycles diametric is not very likely. That is why I have already changed the cycle count and pattern.

      Delete
  9. Much has been said how there is a difference between TA and trading. I find this a little confusing because I thought TA helps guide trading. If we have to wait for a drop below 3209 (according to Neely) to confirm that B is over, then haven't we missed a huge drop? In other words, how do we use TA to guide our trading? Finally, how do you plan on playing this drop? 3x ETF's? UVXY? Thank you Krasi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are talking about the most complicated case reversal. There is no guarantee that your analysis is right. It depends on how you trade you have to choose one of the options.
      Low risk trading - trade only in the direction of the trend in this case you need confirmation for reversal. The analysis is confirmed the risk is low.
      Looking for more profit betting on top/bottom - than you trade without confirmation, but your analysis could be wrong and the risk is higher.

      I am waiting for pattern,cycles and indicators to align showing imminent top/bottom, then the trigger close below MA10 to trigger a trade. I am trading triple ETFs and this time is not different.

      Delete
  10. Replies
    1. Maybe, this will just confirm the new cycle count.

      Delete
  11. What the value of MA 10 krasi

    ReplyDelete
  12. Krasi, can the new cycle count invalidate the whole corrective structure or is it just the next few weeks like you showed over the weekend charts with the C wave getting delayed?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The past can not be changed, the waves are corrective. The top is delayed in time and it is possible to be a lower high.

      Delete
    2. My friend's mother in law just gave him money to invest in EV stocks. Looks like the party is getting bigger and it is going to run late into the night.. :-)

      Delete
    3. The best time to buy Tesla:))))

      Delete
  13. yesterday was 20d low

    ReplyDelete
  14. Some time ago Krasi posted SVXY chart...just a quick update on that, we are getting close to the top of the bear flag around 42...while UVXY is underway to a double bottom...https://imgur.com/XwAMPKR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The canary in the coal mine, which most ignore....

      Delete
  15. Krasi, do you think it's b wave?
    S&P arrive to the top line

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because of short term cycles it fit better as b/b and c/b starting.
      If this is not the case b completed as triangle and c is already running.

      Delete
  16. THere is going to be a top this friday or Monday. I think this is a big one, expecting at least 25% drop from here

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now why do you say this ?

      Delete
    2. We are in or close to wave v of 5 of wave c of wave B, once complete we will make wave C down. Wave v needs to form a zigzag because it is an ending pattern. I am expecting a new high for a very brief period of time. They could stretch this out into late next week.

      Delete
    3. I expect to stretch it in time another two weeks then down at least to MA200.

      Delete
  17. QQQ looks like impulse down nov 9-10 and a clear abc retrace finishing today. I think tech will lead it down as it lead it up. Happy thanksgiving Krasi and all!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Is USD showing us the true count?
    https://imgur.com/wx4BXF7
    https://imgur.com/iN8Amo7

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Neither USD nor SPX is an impulse all corrective waves.

      Delete